Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | RajT88's commentslogin

Kubernetes with production workloads allowed companies to finally realize the "fail fast" ethos.

With Kubernetes this hated it must be boring enough to safely start using!

It's boring, alright. You're gonna curse this moment when you realize you've become a yaml engineer.

Actually, I bet AI is pretty good at creating those damn manifests. It's mostly regurgitation after all.


Low code solutions like PowerApps I bang out stuff like this all the time. If your use case is limited enough, it makes lazy developers very productive.

I would make the case as well that software underwent demographic shift as the demand skyrocketed and the barriers to entering the profession with languages and tooling dropped.

80's/90's dev teams were more weird nerds with very high dedication to their craft. Today devs are much more regular people, but there are a lot more of them.


Definitely. There’s pluses and minuses to that shift.

I would add "predictable" to that as well.

I fed Claude Pro a REST API spec and told it to spit out a Powershell module and well... So far that 27k lines of code largely checks out (minus the undocumented stuff I knew about).

Getting it to write the pester scripts was a very different matter...


I agree with it, but it's a wild world we live in when the best spreadsheet has default behaviors which will fuck your data pasted into it when you're not paying attention.

Yeah, its also awesome when you open a CSV with long numbers like tracking numbers or IMEIs and they get converted to scientific notation and lose "precision" when saved in Excel format...

Exactly what I'm talking about. I'm sure there's other gremlins in there, but this one bites me the most often, and the hardest.

The one failure mode is so fucking insidious where it zeros out your last 2 digits, but otherwise it looks like it pasted OK!


You may want to revisit all those historical texts, because we did not fail to enforce our laws, we chose to because it benefitted us.

The people calling for reform do not seem to understand the literal costs of doing so.


We’re saying the same thing. I merely phrased it in the negative to underscore the contrast.

If the argument hangs on one interpretation of a single word or turn of phrase, when there are multiple interpretations, it is not a strong argument.

This doesn't. It turns on the non-existence of a phrase.

They found some bullshit way of negating, "a well regulated militia". You are completely correct this will be the focus.

Textualism when they want to uphold it, originalism when they do not.


You may enjoy the book Starship Troopers.

I am not a great (some would argue, not even good) programmer, and I find a lot of issues with LLM generated code. Even Claude pro does really weird dumb stuff.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: