Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | believ3's commentslogin

Congrats! Two comments after trying the app out:

1) The thunder sounds loop too quickly; can you find sources that are longer perhaps (like 15+ mins)? 2) Can you try to source more unique thunder sounds?

Thank you!


For sure..very helpful feedback. Will find better thunders


Any plans to integrate with native Apple Notes app?


what kind of integration you expect? export?


I don't get it. Google Docs rolled out Markdown support in the front-end UI, but there's ZERO support via the Google Docs API. It feels like there is NO way to programmatically do the "Paste from Markdown" operation that's supported in the UI.

Am I missing something?


"accross" is misspelled on your front page


"Support Respons" is also misspelled in your product screenshot


Thanks for spotting those! We'll fix it asap


For those in the US, stay safe tomorrow!

Bonus: https://app.suno.ai/song/0d7698d3-4890-46c3-afcc-8cca893fd56...


The old Nest DropCam cameras are about to go EOL next month in April 2024. It's too bad that hardware isn't supported by this project.


Please inform the developers of the characteristics of your cameras. Perhaps they simply don't have them.


Yeah, it seems like the only "general solution" to this problem is to measure the number of "human work hours" that went into the production of a specific type of "content".

Content would then be labeled as "AI generated" if the "human work hours" was less than X hours (like 0.5 hours).

Whereas content would not be labelled as "AI generated" if the "human work hours" was greater than or equal to X hours (like 0.5 hours).

That would likely require sharing with YouTube not just the final work product, but rather all the iterative work product that led to the creation of the final work product (i.e., earlier drafts). When YouTube could calculate the number of "human work hours" based on the incremental creation/edit histories when analyzing all the drafts.

This is a very hard problem and unlikely to actually be solved in this way.


A percentage would be better.

>That would likely require sharing with YouTube not just the final work product, but rather all the iterative work product that led to the creation of the final work product (i.e., earlier drafts).

Not necessarily. YouTube generally trusts the word of the creator. If I upload a video and check the box that says "there is no swearing in this video" then YouTube more or less takes my word for it. They try to do some detection, but it has always been spotty.

I think YouTube would just ask the creator to label the video and that's it. If somebody is found to be in violation too many times then their account gets actioned.


So your solution is proof of work?


> Exceptions to this policy:

> Your Google Account contains a gift card with a monetary balance.

So, all I need to do to keep a Google Account active indefinitely is just link an unspent $10 gift card to the account? Sweet!


This could be an effect of California law that doesn't allow businesses to expire gift certificates. They have to honor it as long as they're still in business.


Why would you do that though? You can always open new accounts for free, than "pay" $10 for one..


The whole ruse is because people store so much data with Google and dont want to bother with backing it up/cant back it up easily (i dont know, i never used G that much)

Plus, email is your everything now. Its your login, its your invoice book.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: