Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | c0wb0yc0d3r's commentslogin

Advent calendars track time until Christmas. “12 days of Christmas” are the twelve days after Christmas.

Aspose is the library I’ve used commercially in the past, too. My experience was similar. The company I worked for at the time eventually charged more for PDF export as a paid add on. The software is very sticky so the people who truly needed pdf export directly paid, the rest relied on export to word then “printed” the pdf themselves.


I feel like there is a difference here. A calculator has no bias. LLMs do, obviously. News is not the place for bias. Unless the LLM used hallucinated the operator’s intentions, the operator was using the LLM to doctor the article to capture readers not report the news.


> News is not the place for bias

TBH, I think that journalists tying themselves into pretzels in an effort to remain unbiased does more damage than the presence of some bias. As a consumer of news, I want journalists to be biased, for example, towards the rule of law, the preservations of institutions, and checks & balances, and even norms.


I don't see why a content can't carry a label saying "AI-generated", or "Reviewed by AI", or "Refined using AI" etc. This allows consumer to consume it with appropriate caution.


Could this be some sort of joint venture? In other words, is Apple being paid to promote this in some way?

I realize this is a “limited edition” item but it seems to me as being way off brand.


apple x designer fashion has been around a while https://www.apple.com/apple-watch-hermes/


The answer to your question is in the article :)


It feels like a relic from the iPod Nano era


This is the thought that I always have whenever I see the mention of coding standards. Not only should there be standards they should be enforced by tooling.

Now that being said a person should feel free to do what they want with their code. It’s somewhat tough to justify the work of setting up infrastructure to do that on small projects, but AI PRs aren’t likely a big issue fit small projects.


There is Java and bedrock. Everyone I know has Java. There are other differences, but multiplayer is available in both.


The difference it's that bedrock allows you to play with the people that use Minecraft on consoles or mobile and Java doesn't


Another key difference is that Java has mods and shaders, bedrock doesn't.

Mojang is trying to fix this with resource and data packs, but even still, those are not full powered mods.


You're right, my bad!

I remembered some friends complaining about the fact the since MS, they couldn't play as they did before because of two versions co-existing


I'm curious as to why it doesn't have USB 3.0 ports. Do they take too much power? Too much space?


USB 3 is significantly more complicated to implement, and the hub chips are quite a bit more expensive. Hardware-wise it would've become by far the hardest part of this board.

USB 2, on the other hand, is fairly trivial. You almost have to try to get it wrong - especially when you are not concerned about certification.


Going by the task at hand, registering keystrokes pressed by a human, USB 3 is also not quite needed.


PS/2 is far more trivial and low-latency than USB.


I'll remember that next time I'm developing an FPGA keyboard for my Gateway computer.


Many of the latest gaming mobos still have PS/2 exactly because of the low latency.



If you or someone can find that thread I would find it an interesting read.

My cursory research indicates that a low end ryzen would make sense if you are building the board yourself. Right now, I haven’t found a new ryzen mini pc sub 200$. New N100 minis can be had for 150-175$, and if you don’t care so much about power N95 minis are even cheaper.


> I tried running OpenWrt as a wired router on an x86 mini PC, and found that it had some really powerful features and was certainly rock solid as a router. But there were some major annoyances, too. For example, their documentation includes a script for expanding the root filesystem [1] that left my system unable to boot.

I have been doing this myself recently. The docs around this are pretty out of date. The docs as they’re written only work for the ext4 images if I remember correctly. I got it to work with the squashfs version, but it was really janky. The problem is the OS just writes the to the empty space at the end of the squash partition without changing the partition table. I could only successfully get it working if resized the partition on first boot before the writable overlay is created.

> And while I didn't use it long enough to make it through an upgrade, their documentation on upgrades makes the process sound very brittle (it sounded like configs for installed packages don't carry over by default) and confusing.

I feel similarly about the process. There is either a command or a place on disk where you can put files to protect them across upgrades, but I can’t remember just now. I think it works that way because it’s targeted at embedded devices where I would think you typically bake everything you need into the root file system at compile time. I’m not an embedded engineer so maybe there are better ways of doing it.


> The docs as they’re written only work for the ext4 images if I remember correctly

I was using an ext4 image and still ran into problems. And in addition to the scripts on the page that I linked above, I also tried this other variation from their docs [1]. They all ended up rendering the sytem unbootable.

Eventually I think I ended up using an Ubuntu Live ISO to boot the system and made the change there. Definitely a bit of a pain, and according to the docs it sounds like something I would need to do again after an upgrade.

I also tried following their steps for "building your own image with larger partition size" [2], but couldn't get that to work either.

I had fun playing around with OpenWrt. But in the end was forced to admit that I didn't really need any features in OpenWrt, and whatever benefits I was getting from it were not worth the effort. Also, even a minute of downtime for a reboot was pretty annoying to my family when they were trying to stream a movie, etc.

[1] https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/advanced/expand_root

[2] https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/installation/openwrt_x86...


I know the answer to this. The ext4 filesystem that openwrt creates by default is just janky. To get well-working filesystem that you can resize etc, you need to build custom image with a small patch to fix up the ext4 fs creation.

https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/7729#issuecomment-...

https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/compare/main...zokier:ope...

This is exactly the sort of thing why I'd want a openwrt for "big" devices. But I should get that patch also merged upstream...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: