Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | guidedlight's commentslogin

Perhaps Microsoft plans to bundle Windows into its "Microsoft 365" subscription for the consumer market.


How is YouTube going to deal with all the storage of these videos?


Look forward to further increases in pricing, whether through subscription rates or ad frequency or anti-ad-blocker measures, I guess.

I was thinking the same thing recently after reading a statement by Deezer that their AI music detector now flags more than a third of newly added music. Even if it gets no listens, all that junk has to be processed, stored, and kept available.


Maybe they will avoid the storage cost by generating this slop on the fly; who would notice?


AI compute costs far outweigh storage costs.


I think this game is closer to the Mario Party mini games than Jackbox, in terms of pacing.


It looks like it, and that's great, it's good to have variety.


These games ran so well on IBM XT computers. Honestly, seeing these games made me realise PC’s could be used for gaming.

Carmack was a genius.


I’m fairly certain that Sony TV’s ask you where you want to use it as a Smart TV or a Dumb TV when setting it up.


From what I’ve seen is most organisations have moved to Amazon Corretto, and stuck with it.

It’s TCK-certified, supported by Amazon, and completely free.

So I don’t see the need to use any other distribution, unless it is for a niche requirement.


I wonder if this is why Xbox Series X never achieved a noticeable performance advantage over PlayStation 5, despite having more capable hardware.


The Xbox runs on a custom OS derived from Windows Core. Not the same as a consumer version of Windows.

[Edit] The answer you’re probably looking for is I/O. The PS5 is much faster than the Series X in terms of getting stuff off disk and actually using it. That more than compensates for the small speed advantage the Series X has.


> derived from Windows Core

if you polish a turd, it's still a turd.


I consider that the core of Windows (the NT kernel and win32 api) is actually a very polished gem but it is encased in layers of upon layers of barely polished turds ( winui, the win11 shell, the over agressive telemetry, forced ms635 integration, etc..)


Makes sense, given that allegedly Windows NT is very much next gen OpenVMS... https://www.itprotoday.com/server-virtualization/windows-nt-...


The kernel might be a polished gem but win32 API?

Practical is a term I'd use as win32 has managed to survive to this day but that came with a boatload of hacks and problems. It's ugly.


When you run Steam games on Linux that mostly goes via a version of Wine, which implements win32.

Yes, win32 is ugly, and so is x86.


The kernel is fine, it's all that crap they keep shoving into userspace that's the issue.


I also heard that the PlayStation 5 graphics API's are more optimized to the hardware than DirectX is. Not sure if that's true though.


I've heard that too. And also Xbox had 2 different DirectX APIs, one more customised to the console, and one that's the standard Windows DirectX which is not as performant. From what I've heard most devs used the latter as it made porting the PC version of the game easier, and sales on Xbox would be tiny compared to PlayStation (1/3rd the install base, sales even less than that due to Xbox users not buying games and just using gamepass) there was less incentive to optimise.


That is quite common in all consoles.

Playstation has LibGNM and LibGNMX, Switch has OpenGL and Vulkan but you really want NVN for every drop of performance


This was always the case. Ps3 was supposedly more powerful but devs didn’t care to make use of it and just port and move on to the next project. Only nintendo hardware seemed to get special treatment with game design probably because it was like a generation behind in power.


No it's just slowed down by windows bloat. Weaker and mobile devices suffer the most due to aggressive power saving.


I was so excited for the Series X and it's just another crap-tier wannabe gaming PC, with none of the flexibility. It makes me so sad how miserable the XBox has become. I fucking LOVED the 360 back in the day, I used to run home from school to get on Halo 3 and play with friends.

And granted, those same friends and I still play Halo Infinite, but we're all on PCs. Nobody bothers with the goddamn XBox.


The Xbox died the moment they announced it would require a constant connection to the Kinect, and internet in order to function. Even after backtracking from that, it never recovered. There’s also just a lack of reason for it to exist anymore. The PlayStation fills the need for a high power console, Nintendo offers something portable and gimmicky, what would Xbox even offer here?

These days most consoles run fairly standard hardware and games are programmed to be generic and published on every console.


The PS4 lineup pales in comparison to the PS3 lineup, which pales in comparison to the PS2 lineup, which pales in comparison to the PS1 lineup.

Each generation has around half the number of games as the previous. This does get a bit murky with the advent of shovelware in online stores, but my point remains.

I think this only proves is that games are now ridiculously expensive to create and met the quality standards expected. Maybe AI will improved this in this future. Take-Two has confirmed that GTA6's budget has exceeded US$1 billion, which is mind-blowing.


The US can’t. This has long been solved in other countries, to varying degrees.


Very few examples of this. None in democratic countries.


Finland is a democracy.


can't? lol. more like doesn't want to. not everyone in the world shares your personal values.


Australia has long had fires. Fires are an integral part of Australia’s historic natural environment.

So much so, that Eucalyptus trees evolved to become a fire dependent species that benefits from regular burning. This is why they are so dangerous when planted in places like Los Angeles.


The 2019–2020 fires were so hot that eucalyptus trees actually struggled to reproduce. Trees with pyrophilic seeds that normally like a good scorching were instead totally consumed by the fires, and the soil got so hot that seeds already dropped and buried were burned to death. Trees that store energy in their wood (either underground or shielded by bark) got so hot that their normally safe wood burned.

Obviously not every tree died due to the fires, but the death and destruction left in the wake of this fire was on a scale far surpassing past fires. Not to mention the deaths of animals.

Recommended reading: The End of Eden by Adam Welz, which basically covers how global weirding and extreme weather events have pushed species already teetering on the edge of survival over the brink.


I’m not meaning that ocasional/limited forest fires can or not be healthy for forest. Just that the mentioned ones were all record breaking, and had a significant contribution to long lasting CO2 in the atmosphere, all of them were in similar orders than the 2024 fires.

And that carbon capture through planting trees may be something fragile and short lived.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: