Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | higginsniggins's commentslogin

According to your research paper you should have made this post a "Tell HN:" rather then a "Show HN:", lol


That's litterlly the job of a founder. You talk to cusomters and learn from them.


If your customer base is so broud that you can't define a clear outcome for your nitche, your company probably isnt focused enough. Especially for a start up.


When you go the website the first line is literally “Say hello to Freedom Chat—a next-generation messaging app that keeps your conversations actually private


... and then you encounter things like "Privacy’s been lost. We’re here to take it back." or "World-class security".

It looks like "Freedom" is a sure thing.


Bob is a citizen of X, the site formerly known as twitter where their are no laws


How about and.... this might be too radical for you but here me out...... no one with "dominance for humanity overall"



Any one with a brain knows it is not stolen, but nevertheless the fact that people will claim so is a risk.


It is stolen on a cultural level at least.

But since many of these models will blurt out very obviously infringing material without targeted prompting, it’s also an active, continuous thief.


Honestly, that's not a bad idea for a start up. Maybe a marketplace where people can see what things cost in different places and book a surgery directly.


A free market just means that people are allowed to buy and sell what they want. If a government decides to help some industries that is irrelevant.

It stops being free when government attacks economic activity, not when it promotes it.


"Dumping" (selling at an artificially low price) is widely considered an attack on economic activity of the competitors, even though it may spur the economic activity of the consumers of the products being dumped.

In this regard, the Chinese government pouring large subsidies into solar panel production both spurred the economic activity around installing solar panels, and attacked / thwarted in around production of the panels themselves, if the production happens outside China. Only the US was able to somehow develop solar panel production.


"attack on economic activity of the competitors"

Thats competition. It is a feature of markets.

not a bug.


Not when its done with the help of a government.


why not?


I'm not really disagreeing with you as it's not like there is a 100% true definition of a free market, different people can have different conceptions, but the original Adam Smith / classical view is that a free market should essentially be 100% driven by the private market on supply and demand - with as little government intervention as possible on either side of the ledger (subsidy or blocking)


Monopoly is a free market game and thete is only one winner. Free markets as such is an utopia dream.


Except it isn't at all. The properties to buy all have a fixed price, costs of houses/hotels are fixed, rents are fixed and can't be adjusted, and most importantly, a) you can only buy a property if you randomly happen to land on it and b) people have no choice of what property to stay at (again, chosen by random dice)


mmm by that definition, which market is truly free market again? I'm not sure you can find one tbh


Commodities, large number of buyers and a large number of sellers all buying/selling an equivalent product.

No buyer has power to set prices and no seller does either.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: