Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | iamtedd's commentslogin

That depends on the width of your browser. On my mobile, nearly every paragraph had one word or part of a word as the last line.

Well, he writes often enough, for long enough, and being who he is, he's got to be a large part of everyone's training data.

You're absolutely right!

A kettle needs firmware updates?

I'd say "has" firmware updates rather than "needs". You can see release notes: https://help.fellowproducts.com/hc/en-us/articles/9593179929...

A kettle needs firmware?

Some software features are actually quite nice on kettles! e.g. Mine has adjustable altitude calibration which simplifies things that are temperature-sensitive if you live somewhere with a boiling point notably below 100°: https://www.precisekettlepicks.blog/blog/buying-guides-by-us...

Kinda disappointing that the post that first reported the Ars Technica article and retraction got ~50% more comments than this one at about the same age. Seems people just love to outrage and complain than wait for the promised post-mortem, which if anything, came early.

Ref: https://web.archive.org/web/20260214134656/https://news.ycom...



It's literally a system of patronage, so yes. That's what the patrons sign up for.


also essentially how many large news organizations have pivoted. $520/year for WSJ, $400/year for Bloomberg (excluding terminal-only news and other extras, of course), $390/year for NYT, $120/year for WaPo (with exclusions). For only $2,500 or so a year, you can have a balanced stream of news and journalism. -But not your household; you need to pay extra for family plans.

(or you can do what most people do)


I have no issues with mygov in firefox (on linux of all platforms). I don't even whitelist ublock origin on that domain. Check your other extensions.


Russia has elections, where people overwhelmingly vote for Putin..


So you are alleging that Reddit manipulates vote totals to affirm their biases? There's plenty wrong with Reddit, but I haven't seen any credible evidence that this is the case.


No, I'm saying nothing of the sort. Look at the context to which i replied.


That is not AI. The same voice narrates at least two years ago. Just scroll down in the channel's video list.


The description of the video states it is in fact AI:

> A synthesized text-to-video voiceover was used in the narration for this story.


Where does it say that? I can’t see it in the video description.


The second line. The video description for me says the following:

"HAWAIʻI VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK - An incredible sight at the summit of Kilauea volcano on Saturday morning, as Episode 38 erupted enormous lava fountains across the caldera, destroying one of the webcams that was live streaming the event.

All images and video are courtesy the U.S. Geological Survey. A synthesized text-to-video voiceover was used in the narration for this story."


Nit: TrueNAS migrated away from Kubernetes in 2024.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: