Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ibejoeb's commentslogin

And it diminishes search accuracy. You can publish a reasonable criticism, but if people don't see it, you're not changing minds.

That's pretty much over, too. PatronScan and others collect and share data as a first-class feature, e.g., to broadly 86 people.

https://www.sacbee.com/food-drink/article231580393.html


>Thiel and his friends support the government snatching citizens off the streets

What's the story here?


The Palantir app helping ICE raids in Minneapolis: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46633378

ICE using Palantir tool that feeds on Medicaid data: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46756117



Isn't that just email then? I mean I guess you could wrap a bubbly UI around it, but you're not getting around the latency and spam. Those seem like dealbreakers to me.

Latency isn’t that much of an issue. There might be greylisting for the initial message, but once the receiving server knows you, it’s pretty usable. And since everything is an email, you can “chat” with people that don’t use DeltaChat and they can reply using their normal email program. If you’re not using encryption, that is.

I do like that last part. Still, it would be difficult to have a contemporaneous conversation that way.

>OSS will be sufficient for most businesses

Only for well defined tasks. There's not really a practical upper bound. We will keep throwing more complex tasks at it to the extent that it can handle them. Like if you just need fancy OCR, then a specific model will probably suffice, but there will be an appetite for human- or superhuman-level intelligence that never gets tired and has no rights.


K2.5 run on your own gear is an Orca tube away from 4.5, R4 will be stronger.

The gap is growing and the second derivative is positive. They don't catch up until it saturates.


> run on your own gear

Where does that fall within the range of Mac Studio, Nvidia 4090, H100?


(1) is true, but actually driving is definitely harder without hearing or with diminished hearing. And Several US states, including CA, prohibit inhibiting hearing while driving, e.g., by wearing a headset, earbuds, or earplugs.

Moreover, why draw a hard line on vision only when there is existing technology is available to augment it? It's not like they have to develop 3 novel technologies.

Maybe I'm giving GM too much credit, but it seems to me that GM acquired the technology with the intention to bring it into their vehicles as driver assistance, not autonomous driving. They were pretty candid about not wanting to operate taxis. Cruise itself was embroiled in investigations and was prohibited from operating in SF and voluntarily ceased operations in other markets, which basically made it a target, and since GM had already dumped a few billion into it, it probably made sense to at least get unencumbered rights to the tech.

That is one of the weirder aspects of this run of the simulation.

Ring: just want you to know that we record everything whether you pay us or not and we know where you dog is.

Savannah: Where's Ma?

Ring:


FWIW, Nancy's camera was a Nest, not Ring.

My mistake. Despite that, I don't have much confidence that nest isn't also uploading everything at all times.

I do. The battery life on our units varies depending on the amount of foot traffic that they see. One is at our front door, where package deliveries and entry/egress trigger 5-10 times daily, and the other is in our backyard, where it is triggered a 5-10 times weekly. The backyard camera lasts much longer per charge.

This tends to indicate that they are only recording/uploading in response to specific triggers. They also have LEDs that supposedly light up whenever they are recording.


It's so overt that I wouldn't blame you for thinking that they don't care and that they want you to know.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: