Why spend all this money to build bunkers in likely the first places to be fully underwater when global catastrophes/climate shit goes down? Lol. I'd build mine in the middle of Wyoming or something.

You realize Hawaii is made up of mountains, correct?

In general it is better to act as those who tell you things are going to be a certain way do, not as they say. That means it is unlikely for e.g. Martha's Vineyard to end up fully underwater when global catastrophes/climate shit goes down given the fact that the Obamas moved there to a property which lies about 4 metres (13 ft.) above the high tide line. With an average sea level rise of 3 mm/year it will take a while for the island to be flooded.

Plot twist: the Hawaii bunker is just the decoy bunker

Depending on what the threat is, underwater could offer an additional layer of protection?

> all this money

All what money? Scaled for a net worth of 100k, this would cost less than $200.

Positive replies are most definitely using GPT-4

Last two paragraphs starting with "however" and "ultimately" SCREAM chatGPT generated to me

As least I didn't add "I hope this response finds you well."

MidJourney has the describe function which is kind of like that. Not sure how decent it actually is

So nothing is changing then

What are humans mechanisms for determining truth?

As far as I'm aware, the scientific method is the best we have at the moment and it has delivered pretty good results.