Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | letrix's commentslogin

> Repositories are replicated across peers in a decentralized manner

You lost me there


"Replicated across peers in a decentralized manner" could just as easily be written about regular Git. Radicle just seems to add a peer-to-peer protocol on top that makes it less annoying to distribute a repository.

So I don't get why the project has "lost you", but I also suspect you're the kind of person any project could readily afford to lose as a user.


What this is trying to say: - "peers": participants in the network are peers, i.e. both ends of a connection run the same code, in contrast to a client-and-server architecture, where both sides often run pretty different code. To exemplify: The code GitHub's servers run is very different from the code that your IDE with Git integration runs. - "replicated across peers": the Git objects in the repository, and "social artifacts" like discussions in issues and revisions in patches, is copied to other peers. This copy is kept up to date by doing Git fetches for you in the background. - "in a decentralized manner": Every peer/node in the network gets to locally decide which repositories they intend to replicate, i.e. you can talk to your friends and replicate their cool projects. And when you first initialize a repository, you can decide to make it public (which allows everyone to replicate it), or private (which allows a select list of nodes identified by their public key to replicate). There's no centralized authority which may tell you which repositories to replicate or not.

I do realize that we're trying to pack quite a bit of information in this sentence/tagline. I think it's reasonably well phrased, but for the uninitiated might require some "unpacking" on their end.

If we "lost you" on that tagline, and my explanation or that of hungariantoast (which is correct as well) helped you understand, I would appreciate if you could criticize more constructively and suggest a better way to introduce these features in a similarly dense tagline, or say what else you would think is a meaningful but short explanation of the project. If you don't care to do that, that's okay, but Radicle won't be able to improve just based on "you lost me there".

In case you actually understood the sentence just fine and we "lost you" for some other reason, I would appreciate if you could elaborate on the reason.


LeanCreator:

- Unzip archive

- Try double-click, security error

- Go to Privacy & Security and click "Open anyway"

- Try double-click again, it opens fine.

ObreonSystem:

- Open DMG and copy all the files to a folder

- Try double-click, program opens fine but errors because missing files.

- Uses instructions given in README, running with './ObreonSystem', and program opens without errors.

macOS 26.0.1


> "Go to Privacy & Security and click "Open anyway"

Thanks. Unfortunately this no longer works on sequoia; you first have to run "spctl --global-disable" in a terminal and then - within a few seconds - go to Privacy & Security and select the new option in the popup menu (which was not available before). See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41184553. That's what I meant by "tricks". And even though there are apps which still didn't work. But fortunately I still have a Mac with an older OS version which I'm not going to upgrade.


SnapDrop/PairDrop is famous for going offline sometimes. It happened to me once.


Have you looked at Tauri mobile or it isn't capable yet?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: