I have the same setup, just Arch instead of ubuntu on my laptop and I very rarely have any issues (like maybe once per month) that require me to reboot.

Once every few weeks and once per month seem pretty much the exact same - and about in line with my own experience with Windows on my work machine.

It's always a pleasure watching your videos, even when I don't like the topic; you seem like a genuine person that enjoys tech. Thank you for the content.

Don't you think you're being a bit too pedantic? Nothing really "sees". Eyes also do gather light and the brain analyzes the signals. We've invented a word for it but the word is a high level abstraction that could easily be applied to a camera sensor as well.

I am very much on the triggered side when people say things like “this is how my camera sees it”, because it’s never what they show. What sensor sees is numbers that without interpretation by you, the human, and/or automated software are meaningless.

What people show when they say “this is how my camera sees it” is always “this is how I see it”, or more more specifically “this is how I want you to see it”—as the interpretation of that raw data is a critical part—and I think it’s not very pedantic to point it out.

You missed the point. I could say more, but not to some random person who chooses to insult me.

Saying you're being too pedantic is an insult? Wasn't intended to be.

Random ad hominem criticisms from strangers are insulting. Stick to substance and stop insulting people and then pretending you didn't.

Over and out.

At some point after ever conversation terminates in you getting a "random ad hominem" you have to re-evaluate the thought process that led you to that point.

> I almost immediately surmised it's some sort of on the fly generated vm you can access via a ssh jumpserver

How? It just says `ssh exe.dev`. Unless you are clairvoyant.

"ssh exe.dev" is exactly the Linux command you would use to connect there via ssh. And it's stylized like command prompt.

The question wasn't "how to ssh into a server", it was "how did you figure out what it it from looking at the website"

Because it literally tells you what to do

"exe.dev is a subscription service that gives you virtual machines, with persistent disks, quickly and without fuss."

scroll down and hit the "about" link. I do agree though the landing page could be more resourceful.

I'm not going to SSH to a random server.

That's my point, the home/landing page tells you nothing other than "try to ssh into this van"

All a malicious website has to do to be convincing is to have a more conventional landing page then?

The disk and sudo mentioned are good enough clues, then you have the about.

Where did I say that, that wasn't a topic I just commented on the *entirety* of the content on the landing page.

> The disk and sudo mentioned are good enough clues

I mean, you do you and let's agree to disagree about a good landing page UX.

tbh maybe this service doesn't want you as a customer if you can't figure this out. it seems like you'd be an above-average support burden

Are you honestly suggesting that startups should be picky about taking on customers?

That’s probably the oddest thing to read on a tech VC forum.

The lading page was garbage. It’s forgivable because designing goods landing pages is hard. But inventing wacky ideas about why a bad landing page might have some hidden genius, isnt constructive feedback

Why are you giving in to such a troll/AI/low effort comment. If the page was some genius implication and I were too stupid to get it then his comment had a good point. The page has a random ssh command and this dude thinks it's genius.

> I'm not going to SSH to a random server.

Opening a random website likely exposes you to more risk.

Likely? Definitely.

How to ssh into a server isn’t a question, it’s a command.

Being pedantic, I meant statement not command.

It's not interactive. It's just an extremely brief brochure for the actual service, which is available via SSH. All the useful copy is under the About link at the bottom, which is so light as to fail WCAG contrast standards.

Ah, that makes sense, thank you!

You are not the target audience if "how" was not apparent to you

I am the target audience and I still had no idea what the site was promoting from just the landing page.

Someone else said it's not actually interactive. So which is it?

The "how" is very obvious, but not the "why". I'd assume this much would be very apparent from the OPs complaint, but apparently not I guess...

I became target audience after I had a cup of coffee...

I mean, I've done engineering work for the last 15 years on most layers of the stack. Seeing an ssh command into a fancy url does not tell me anything about what that is going to accomplish. But yeah, you must be right.

Aim for all three of CAP to really hit the right vibes.

But that's not what anyone is arguing here, nor what (to me it seems at least) uncloud is about. It's about simpler HA multinode setup with a single/low double digit containers.

I think it primarily comes from people being entrenched in their early opinions that AI is shit and they're now moving goalposts without actually giving it a shot.

> 3 things we know about the AI revolution in 2025:

> - LLMs are amazing, but they have reached a plateau. AGI is not within reach.

Source/citation?

> Apple Intelligence > currently toggled as 'off'

There's a good joke in there somewhere

Too bad you won’t be able to find it in that mess

You're absolutely right!

The more infuriating part of that remark is when its due to you pointing out something really dumb, then you ask yourself, why didn't it ask this in its reasoning? lol