Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more mNovak's commentslogin

Grammarly certainly comes to mind, for being essentially a free feature of most chat AIs now.

Interestingly this time around I could see the 'fire' affecting mid-large corporations (or at least some divisions of them) if they don't adapt. Adobe, being heavily focused on graphic design seems like it could be under pressure. Low-end consulting / outsourcing is largely doing the same work AI is good at. Similarly with technical gig-work (like Upwork).


People don't seem to realize that Oracle is deep in the AI play, taking on a bunch of debt to make speculative leases and buildout of datacenters to rent to other players.

It's been great for them so far, but if there's an AI winter, Oracle will be the first to freeze.


Random but this is a very well written line:

> It's been great for them so far, but if there's an AI winter, Oracle will be the first to freeze.

Kudos


> Oracle will be the first to freeze

one can hope


Will this somehow liberate ZFS?


It’ll just make their auditors and legal team desperate for money, which is kinda horrifying to consider.


It could make it worse. IP from companies that got chopped up and sold for parts can be a nightmare. You may have to do deals with multiple parties, and it can be unclear who owns what (even to the potential owners themselves).


How does ZFS need to be liberated?


There is debate as to whether the FreeZFS license (CDDL) is compatible with the GPL, which is why FreeZFS is not part of the Linux Kernel. Some distros are baking it in, but there has long been concern about if merging it violates the license or not.


They took the entire Solaris code back to proprietary source and kept improving ZFS themselves. For instance, they added encryption.


> They took the entire Solaris code back to proprietary source and kept improving ZFS themselves.

And OpenZFS/Linux/FreeBSD kept improving ZFS as well.

> For instance, they added encryption.

As did OpenZFS.


Even if Oracle evaporated and their contemporary ZFS source became unencumbered, I doubt OpenZFS would want to try and merge significantly parts. They already have their own encryption implementation for example.


Isn’t that all from the one OpenAI deal they made 5 months ago?


Is there a video clip of the simulation anywhere? Would be interested to see it


So would a $300B Anthropic get included in the SP500?


I think there are profitability requirements, right?


Profitability in both 3 month and 12 month spans. Also minimum 12 months of trading history after IPO.

See page ~9 of https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/methodologies/me...


Of all the players, I'd argue Google certainly knows how to give away a product for free and still make money.

The local open source argument doesn't hold water for me -- why does anyone buy Windows, Dropbox, etc when there's free alternatives?


Not many people buy Windows, they buy laptops that happen to have Windows installed. IMO this is a worthwhile distinction because most people don’t really care about operating systems anyway, and would happily (I suspect, at least) use an Open Source one if it came installed and configured on a device that they got in a store.

Installing an OS is seen as a hard/technical task still. Installing a local program, not so much. I suspect people install LLM programs from app stores without knowing if they are calling out to the internet or running locally.


Yes, it seems to me their strategy is to watch the OpenAI, Anthropics, etc of the world bleed themselves to death.


> why does anyone buy Windows, Dropbox, etc when there's free alternatives?

No one buys Windows - it comes with the PC.

If people were shipped blank computers and told to order the OS separately, they wouldn't be buying Windows at the current price point.


Nice article; far from bullet-proof, but it brings up some interesting points. HN comments are vicious on the topic of AI non-bubbles.


Broad estimates I'm seeing on the cost of a 1GW AI datacenter are $30-60B. So by your own revenue projection, you could see why people are thinking it looks like a pretty good investment.

Note that if we're including GPU prices in the top-line capex, the margin on that $70-150B is very healthy. From above, at 0.4J/T, I'm getting 9MT/kWh, or about $0.01/MT in electricity cost at $0.1/kWh. So if you can sell those MT for $1-5, you're printing money.


> So if you can sell those MT for $1-5, you're printing money.

The IF is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.

I understood the OP in the context of "human history has not produced sufficiently many tokens to be sent into the machines to make the return of investment possible mathematically".

Maybe the "token production" accelerates, and the need for so much compute realizes, who knows.


My interpretation of that moment was that they had already decided to give away protein sequences as charity, it was just a decision of all as a bundle vs fielding individual requests (a 'service').

Still great of them to do, and as can be seen it's worth it as a marketing move.


(as an aside, this is a common thing that comes up when you have a good model: do you make a server that allows people to do one-off or small-scale predictions, or do you take a whole query set and run it in batch and save the results in a database; this comes up a lot)


I think most people (namely high school seniors) go to college for neither. They go because that was the expectation, and was assumed to be at least approximately productive path.

While arguably that's indirectly 'for the piece of paper', I'd argue the pleasant experience is a factor too, even if not quoted as such. i.e. if it was a purely rational, economic choice (my interpretation of going to college just for the degree) we'd see higher enrollment in high-ROI majors.


The chatGPT endorsement is /chefs kiss/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: