Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | normalaccess's commentslogin

I don't think age verification is the actual goal... I believe complete surveillance and information control is the goal. Age verification is just the justification they are using to coat the poison pill in sugar.

"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." -- Cardinal Richelieu

Privacy protects personal dignity, not just illicit behavior. We close bathroom doors, keep journals, and have intimate conversations not because we are breaking the law, but because we value personal modesty and boundaries.

We are quickly approaching a time when we are all guilty until proven innocent by voyeuristic power-hungry psychopathic megalomaniacs who cry the old cry of "If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect


I do not disagree with the intentions of the quote, however it is disputed.

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Cardinal_Richelieu#Disputed


Nobody is installing surveillance cameras in you bathroom.

They would really, really like to. Kids at school vape in there, people do drugs in public ones.

Nobody is installing surveillance cameras in you bathroom yet.

And this is how freedom dies, not by the letter of the law, but by the spirit.

I have this on 24/7. I like them even when I'm not driving.

They might be useful for working during earthquakes.

yes, there is a fine line between "Don't Talk" and standing up for your rights. I feel like it's advisable to speak up when your rights are being violated. I can't quite put the words on what I mean but I think stating a fact like "This is my kid" is A-ok.

I'm also curious should you not answer a question about weapons in the car?

I would honestly say it couldn't help because it's not like they'd believe you if you said no and saying yes could make them suspicious. So while it seems like something that would be important to answer for safety, maybe it's safer to decline to answer.

Of course, if they're threatening you, you should comply because the place to fight is in the courtroom, not on the road.


Sometimes it's smart to be silent.

Pro 17:28

Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding.


Note that in the US, you need to verbally assert your right to remain silent.

Merely being silent means the prosecution is able describe your communication as "refused to cooperate with or answer questions from law enforcement" which is a "negative" finding, whereas the right to remain silent is at least meant to be interpreted neutrally.


That is a very good point depending on the situation. On the flip side, abstaining from the process and remaining silent (but still compliant) can put a spotlight on injustice if there be any.

I don't know... The null set is still a set.


Yes but that’s only half of the atheist equation

It’s saying I don’t know and also saying I do not have a belief in any particular thing

So it’s accurately:

“I don’t know what set it is and I don’t even believe in the concept of a set”

So for me I reject the concept because nobody has ever offered their definition of god with a falsifiable hypothesis


When that happens, they will be able to rewrite reality in real time.


For TRUE offline password storage use "Off The Grid". A cryptographically secure paper based password generator created by Steve Gibson from he Security Now podcast.

https://www.grc.com/offthegrid.htm


You spelled world wrong. China has their social credit, EU has their cameras, America has Palantir, Starlink has internet everywhere, 5G can be used as radar, age verification is being deployed globally, ect... Babylon reborn.

Edit: UK not EU


UK: hold my beer...


I think GP meant to s/EU/UK/, as in "UK has their cameras", because "EU has their cameras" doesn't make much sense to me as EU citizen...


Yep, got my wires crossed, thanks for the correction.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: