Thanks for this! I never used go but planning for a while and if I do so, I’d like to do it in a reactive way. As I’ve seen there are a few other reactive go libs as well, may I ask how this new lib relates to them?

We renamed master to main for nonsense. Broke everything. Still, companies and people were proud of it (lol).

Why we do not just use EcmaScript from now on in conversations and as a trend so the issue is solved. A joke to me.

Names are a funny thing. When gay marriage was still disputed I argued for just dropping the word "marriage" from law. My country has had civil partnerships available to all since 2000, which is gay marriage in everything but name. A decade later and people were still fighting for the name. I don't get it but language is a powerful thing and means a lot to some people.

As for master->main, that was just fake activism by people desperately wanting to be a part of something but not prepared to put in any actual work to convince anyone of anything they don't already agree with. Convincing people to drop the name JavaScript would be difficult due to the attachment and perceived loss to an evil company.

What did it break for you? It was a relatively straightforwardly renaming process.

I've discovered submodules and build pipelines broken due to a changed name within the last year. Doesn't help that some people are late to the party and still changing things now. But, hey, at least I've done my part against slavery /s

Interested in that too.

I have to be honest - I haven't ever heard about it. Just checked and found it's very mature and popular, though it seems to have had no commits in the last 2 years.

After quick scanning, I'd highlight these 2 differences: - Rill is type safe and uses generics - Rill does not try to hide channels, it just provides primitives to transform them

Same conclusion here. May I ask about your stack/domain?

Yes, but one does not have to reliably make assertions to feed a meme.

People want to be good. The current agenda God says you are good if you sacrifice to the CO2 god. No need to make reliable assertions to feel good about it. Anyone who challenges the act of sacrifice is someone to burn. No challenge means no problems.

Anyone who wants to see both sides of the Co2 discussion is already sceptical at minimum. But it does not make you feel good. Therefore its rare. It feels good to sacrifice to the Co2 god. “Lemme sacrifice you fool.”

Very cool. Turned my brain off. High pitch is a bit too sharp fir me.

We are the AGI :)

Wondering if there would be an "easier" way to express something in biology/evolution, then the evolution would (already) compressed it like that.

Maybe by definition: current existing things in evolution are not "more compressable" (for us) without losing meaning? (Their meaning could be estimated though through -leaky- abstractions?)

I I try to type randomly without checking the prediction, I get 67-70%, if I check it, I can easily get it to 46-50%.

It is really interesting.