Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sammy2255's commentslogin

Doesn't it differ by aircraft too? I believe the 787 dreamliner has a UV water purification system for potable water.

Why did you write your comment with ChatGPT?

@grok is this true?

They had me until they hit me with their "It's not just poop; it's fart." writing style

I don't understand how this is possible. I've heard the New York Subway system is riddled with antisocial behaviour, homeless, drunks, people pissing everywhere, etc.

People say the same thing about BART but it’s not bad at all. Turns out people on the internet aren’t reliable.

They've already proved themselves as competent. $50k a year to a billion dollar company is nothing. Even if they find 0 vulnerabilities a year it's still worth it to them

I directionally agree with you but we could go another 20 comments deep on exactly what the purpose of an external pentest or red-team exercise is and how it might not match up perfectly with what an amateur web hacker is currently doing. But like: yeah, they could get into that business, at least until AI eats it.

So now they found a vulnerability, the company should pay them $50k a year until they retire because they proved themselves competent?

Yes?

You should add a graph of visitors per-minute for the status page for the past 24 hours or so. Would really help for situations like this

I'm in the same boat. This is bewildering to me, because I recall Apple making a joke about (it being fixed) in this in the 2023 developer conference:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qD0u0aNyzz8


I don't understand how Perl fell off and PHP didn't


I think PHP is way more accessible syntactically, even with all the standard complaints about the language. In the early 2000s it felt like "simple C style function calls embedded in HTML templates" more or less. Not much to have to teach there.

And serving it tends to be "copy the files to your web server's public dir".


Perl is a very difficult language. PHP was a comparatively simple language. PHP was just a scripting language for C and incorporated as many open source C libraries as possible back when open source libraries were a bit of disjointed mess.

PHP's success and Perl's decline was obvious at the time.


mod_php was dramatically simpler to use than mod_perl. If the sysadmin set it up, you didn't need to know it was there, and your regular PHP just ran really fast. That and nothing else really copied the "scriptable HTML file" paradigm which some people really really liked and made a very low barrier to entry compared to Perl. That's really what kicked off the demise of Perl -- it stopped being the most accessible way onto the internet. PHP also didn't screw up their major language upgrades like Perl did.

RoR helped Ruby push off its inevitable demise for a while, but it's going the same way as Perl. Python got lucky that it's become the defacto choice for everything ML.


I think this is the answer. PHP stayed relevant for so long because deployment was simple and the per-page-load performance hit was reasonably low.


PHP is, at least for me, way, way more readable. Similar enough to Java that you don't have to re-learn syntax too much.


PHP has fallen off. Who is doing anything new in PHP?

PHP has a much bigger legacy of web stuff than Perl, because it was so much easier to use. But there's no future in it. Wordpress, Drupal, Joomla... all had their time but it's all in the past.


As someone who doesn't really know neither Perl nor PHP, PHP is more of a domain-specific EDSL than a mainstream programming language.

One of the few insights in the blog post that aren't stupid, fake, inconsistent and schizophrenic, is the one about PHP's common approach regarding spinning up new processes.


Im thinking the same thing..


Nobody is being forced to use Cloudflare


Since everything is absolutely correct, no one forced it; they just provided a good, excellent solution for free, and consequently, the whole internet has gotten hooked on it. As they say, free cocaine causes harm. So, what are the alternatives? What options are there to protect against DDoS attacks and to make a website quickly accessible from different parts of the world? And at the same time, without paying a sky-high price for it.


> So, what are the alternatives?

That sums up my gripe with the vocal cloudflare haters. They will tell you all day long to move but every solution they push costs more time and money.


Everyone trying to access a site behind Cloudflare is forced.


Then you make a complaint to the company whose site you cannot access...


500 internal server error on most things:

500 Internal Server Error cloudflare


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: