This is really cool. Can you describe more about the scenarios you define and how you manage them over time? I can imagine if you end up with a lot of them, then it becomes time consuming to perform all of the visual tests or handle the human-in-the-loop part.
I wonder if you could do some automated diffing between the scenario results. If they are pretty similar and they were previously considered in a good state, then you don't necessarily need a QA person to review it.
The agent sees which civs are playing in the game that is being analyzed, and pulls season updates and builds from pros specific to those civs and it adds them to the prompt :)
Not saying it does not occur in tech in general, but there is a difference in scale between selling the data and abusing it for personal reasons. The examples you provided are exclusively the latter.
The mentioned employee sold access to 4,887 email accounts.
People who still don’t understand why people pay for Apple products really lack basic piece of wisdom, making their opinion less valuable. Yet they still boast about this particular misunderstanding of theirs.
I think he's suggesting that any given random set of preconceptions will itself be a 'sample' from the entire preconception-space, and therefor itself a preconception - just one that you didn't involve yourself in choosing.
