Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | simonebrunozzi's commentslogin

I have used Nextcloud. If feels about 30-35 years behind the current state of product quality for Google Docs or Microsoft Office. Good luck Europe (that's us).


So, good time to buy on the panic?

If you do, you could protect yourself with a sell stop below $17.25... because if it breaks that on weekly candles, next are $14 and $10. Or you could buy some calls instead when the volatility calms down. If you do it now, the volcrush could happen even if you're correct.

Not investment advice, do you own research. I'm just someone on the Internet.


Thank you stock astrologist

In know you're in jest, but no worries. Strong support around $17 for lots of reasons - would be difficult to push it below that.

In fact there is an open gap that I'd expect it to close around $16.30 and another one around $19


I might go as this for Halloween.

How did you learn algotrading?

/r/wallstreetbets

They just lost one of their good revenue streams though

Id like to sell you a bridge

Beautiful comment. Thanks for sharing. "Homo homini lupus" comes to mind, used by Locke in De Cive ("on the citizen") [1]. Cive, root Civis, is where the word civilization comes from.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_homini_lupus

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Cive


Not surprisingly, Meta is possibly the worst "offender" behind funding of these campaigns.

They're a government contractor specializing in identity and a monopoly who loves not being regulated. They're really a straw donor - this is the government donating money to lobby itself. All of this is money leaving the government proper and being put through barely two degrees of indirection to be sent both to politicians whose job is to direct the government, and to the media to misdirect the public.

This (an end to general purpose computing) isn't anything that people can prevent through civil channels. It will happen with or without public approval. You will have as much control over it as you had over the decision to go to war with Iran. It will never be on any ballot. People who help will get rich, people who don't, won't. Eventually, people who help will barely be middle class, and people who don't, won't. Their kids will own your kids.


AI companies are also donating tens of millions to these PACs and others that are promoting age verification laws, it lets them sell AI content rating systems using their models.

Which is strange, because it is widely known a large amount of their advertising revenue comes from fake accounts.

This doesn’t make sense, how do these fake accounts bring revenue ? I thought the end goal is to improve conversion rate by removing the “bots” and this would therefore lead to higher ad spend and more money to Facebook direct

I work in marketing and not nearly as much effort as you think goes into removing bots. They go after the lowest hanging fruit, the most obvious bots like scrapers and crawlers but most bots impersonating real people easily make it through. Traffic is traffic.

The advertisers still pay, they just don't get conversions.

I’m curious why Meta would benefit. Meta seems wholly unnecessary, the verification can be done at the OS level, completely in the hands of Apple/Alphabet and maybe Microsoft.

If anything, Meta’s utility would seem to shrink if the OS handles proof of being a real person.


Regulatory capture through a higher barrier to entry. Any social media platform that wants to compete with Meta's portfolio will now also need to have an age-verification system in place (which is guaranteed to introduce higher costs). Meta can likely afford to eat the costs here as a tradeoff for the higher impact on smaller players.

It also gives them more information on users as a bonus. Further, verification with a real ID is also a quite effective barrier against excessive bots.


I would think the barrier to entry gets lower because Apple/Alphabet handle age verification, and they let apps/websites use that verification.

Look beyond the CA law, states have already passed laws that put the liability on app and website developers to ensure users aren't kids, there's no passing the buck to Apple or Google.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/12/congresss-crusade-age-...


Meta's entire business model lives on ad deals that are not on the frontend. They are in the data business and this campaign is to get access to more data without an option to opt out. Who takes the data doesn't really matter.

Meta get to impose verified ID on everyone and link it to their advertisers, AND kill competing networks.

because upstart competitors cant afford the verification process / lobbying efforts next instagram wont be bought out, it cant even begin to exist

Liability and they probably want whatever blob of bits they use to identify you from the OS.

1. It deflects any obligation that would have landed on Meta itself to do age verification (which is what the regulators have long asked for). 2. It gives Instagram/Facebook/Messenger the ability to deliver the right ads to the right audience. It's free targeting data.


Tangentially related: anyone has suggestions on an "automated" way to "print" pages with a typewriter? If you want to have papers that "look" as typed with a typewriter, as opposed to printed with laser printers and such.


If you also want a thing to do typewriting on, later-model word processors (e.g., Smith Corona PWP series) tend to have a feature that auto-types text entered and edited earlier. It'll have the imprinting insofar as the type impacts the paper, but it's not going to have the off-center / over-inked / patchy manual typewriter look. For that you may just want to find a font face that replicates it.

This is what a teletype is: it's a typewriter with a serial connection. You send bytes over the serial cable and it types them.

Add this to your list if things you try: https://sixcolors.com/link/2021/02/a-hyperrealistic-typewrit...

Article links right to the font.


This is cool, but when viewed up close, laser-printed letters still lack the fuzzy edges and imprinted texture of letters created by typewriter slugs.

Indeed

You want a daisy wheel printer[1] I think.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisy_wheel_printing


Only tangentially related, but this is a good research starting point: https://www.gt-pressura.com/

The title should say (2021). Great article.


> EDIT: Removed the dot after et; bc apparently it's an entire word (the more you know..)

From latin "et alia", abbreviated as "et al." - it's not a single word but an expression.


> but even certain governments which shall not be named

Why can't you name them, and give us some context? Is this based on public info, or not?


Not the original commenter, but you may have noticed a wee kerfluffle between a large nation-state's "Secretary of War" and a frontier model provider over whether the model's licensing would permit autonomous lethal weapon systems operated by said - and I cannot emphasize the middle word enough - large _language_ model.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: