Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | webworker's commentslogin

For Vimeo customers, the questions are: "What if..." and maybe more importantly, "What now?"

Someone just posted an inside story of what went on inside of Vimeo: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46757868


An excellent dissection, but took me a minute to get through it!

I really don't know what they were thinking with trying to scare off all the little indie creatives with the pivoting to enterprise stuff, who won in that strategy? And why wasn't there room for both? They could have just left the old Vimeo in stasis for those people and created an entirely new product line that'd have been better suited, especially since they were rewriting stuff from scratch anyway.

As pointed out, if you want to win in enterprise, you have to be willing to bend over backward, which is exactly what Microsoft did/had to do to get entrenched and at least part of what locked Apple out until iOS came along.

The bit about BrightCove and the competition explains so much.


I truly do wonder about the amount of tech debt that must be inside of the Messages app on MacOS and iOS. It's got to be massive.

I also wonder what they're using (protocol) under the hood that lags behind other chat clients like Telegram and Signal and WhatsApp. It works, but I wonder how/if it'll continue to scale and stay competitive.


Arc was the only Chrome browser that I could stomach as a development browser/environment. Kind of tight-lipped, but I assume it'll keep getting updates?

I use Safari day-to-day, but its behaviors are inconsistent with caching which makes development hell. I notice this caching behavior even when you have it disabled in the network developer tools.


We need all hands on deck to bring this back to life


A good first step would be a linter that goes over source code for macOS and flags things that are being used that GNUStep doesn't implement. That would inform the most important missing features for it to allow source portability.


Especially so if this could be built as a FreeBSD/NetBSD system for Apple Silicon...


I personally prefer the Power Macintosh 6100 form factor, but even I can appreciate the goofy personality of Apple’s engineers to tease Carl Sagan with a first-generation PowerPC Macintosh. “Cold Fusion” on the 8100 was probably the coolest name of the series, while the poor 6100 got stuck with “piltdown man.”


The same thing exists for eFoils. We (riders) haven't been too impressed with them.


Does „not too impressed“ mean they are worse than a normal propeller or just not better?


They seem to make the ride smoother, but they don't seem to help much with distance/runtime per battery charge. Like a minimal/marginal improvement in that regard, vs a standard prop.


Yeah, between the two, I strongly prefer BitBucket Pipelines. Feels much cleaner.


"Burr, it's cold in here ..."


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: