1. Report is written by an internal committee of Credit Suisse
2. Archegos started as Tiger Asia, got caught doing insider trading, settled with US SEC in 2012. Then re-branded itself as Archegos, operating from Hong Kong focussing on Asian securities. Hong Kong later banned it from operating for four years. This lead to Archegos trading in US, with Asian ADRs (basically Asian securities, converted to US securities equivalent assets)
3. CS basically ignored all the risk factors associated with Tiger Asia / Archegos and continued providing them services.
Looks like they backed a bad player with bad reputation that was sometimes profitable and it came back to bite its behind.
Too bad the contract wasn’t controlled by some kind of algorithm, a ‘smart contract’, if you will. Oh well, guess we’ll just never have a solution for this sort of thing.
I'm all about cryptocoins but wow this is just about the glass-est house to throw stones from. Smart Contracts are notorious for things going wrong. I'm no expert but I kinda doubt a smart contract could make an autonomous margin call. Can't know the value of collateral without trusting a human or two in there somewhere.
Most of these are intentional planned exploits carried out by outsourced creators that insert bugs. It’s a good point, but probably more preventable than observed.
1. Report is written by an internal committee of Credit Suisse
2. Archegos started as Tiger Asia, got caught doing insider trading, settled with US SEC in 2012. Then re-branded itself as Archegos, operating from Hong Kong focussing on Asian securities. Hong Kong later banned it from operating for four years. This lead to Archegos trading in US, with Asian ADRs (basically Asian securities, converted to US securities equivalent assets)
3. CS basically ignored all the risk factors associated with Tiger Asia / Archegos and continued providing them services.
Looks like they backed a bad player with bad reputation that was sometimes profitable and it came back to bite its behind.