> With or without ChatGPT this is easily malpractice and potentially even fraud.
AI has been used and will continue to grow in use as a way to launder discrimination and fraud. AI will never face a penalty from the justice system, so why not blame everything on it?
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here but I pretty clearly place all of the blame on the attorneys - going so far as to describe an equivalent scenario where they just make stuff up.
This is a case that's close to the judiciary. It might be what's needed to nullify the "I was only following the AI" defense by requiring a manual double check.
AI has been used and will continue to grow in use as a way to launder discrimination and fraud. AI will never face a penalty from the justice system, so why not blame everything on it?