Could you not pass around Mutex<T> performantly? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		MuffinFlavored on July 23, 2023 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: I have written a JVM in Rust Could you not pass around Mutex<T> performantly?

skitter on July 24, 2023 [–]

I'm not sure what you mean? Mutability wasn't the issue, lifetimes was. It already implemented interior mutability according to Java's rules.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact