Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's a hangover from the ill-fated Clinton programming language, where you repeat an operator (such as "is") to ensure there is no ambiguity about what your intention is.


Did you mean to write "there is is no ambiguity ..."?


Too early for that pun, it works better at the end as a punchline of sorts, "ensure there is not ambiguity about what your intention is is."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: