Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


ACCount37 expressly left out the coal smoke stacks from their description, so I'm not sure why you chose to focus solely on that and throw it back in?


What are cooling towers for if not for coal smoke stacks?


Nuclear


[flagged]


> I don't mind things like huge cooling towers or massive dams.

^That’s not “cherry picking.“ They are saying the two things that they would not mind seeing in the distance. It is reasonable to assume that it was not an omission to avoid hurting their point, but rather that coal power smoke stacks are not on list.

It strikes me as the much more obvious reading. “Of the things you listed, these two don’t really bother me.”


[flagged]


This is a truly bizarre comment chain.

I read the original comment by ACCount37 in the same way Forbo and BolexNOLA did - that ACCount37 is fine with cooling towers or dams, but not with coal stacks. This is a fully reasonable interpretation, considering the comment they were responding to explicitly listed those 3 examples; had they not been so explicit, it might be more reasonable to interpret it as simply not having an opinion on items not listed, but that isn't the case.

And since you're so keen on pointing out that this is public: you don't come off looking very great. Might wanna work on that.


> This is a truly bizarre comment chain.

> And since you're so keen on pointing out that this is public: you don't come off looking very great. Might wanna work on that.

Please edit out personal swipes from comments on HN. The guidelines ask us all to aim for better than this.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


I'm the one who gets warned? It gets even more bizarre!


[flagged]


We need you to avoid perpetuating or escalating flamewars on HN. Energy/climate topics are among the most predictable flamebait topics, and as a longtime user we need to see you being circumspect and making your contributions de-escalatory rather than escalatory. We've had to ask you several times before respect the site's guidelines and purpose. Please try harder.


You and I can disagree about interpretation all day long but there’s no misinterpreting your incredibly condescending tone. Have a good rest of your Sunday man.


[flagged]


Call it what you want, either way it was rude and unnecessary.

As for your point: If that’s what he’s doing then he’s doing a piss poor job because several of us clearly heard an implied “but not coal fire plant smoke stacks” while he said infrastructure for renewables on the skyline can be pretty.


the clouds comming off nuclear towers is literally just steam. not radioactive steam. just.... steam


That's not even unique to nuclear. Gas and coal can have them too. Typically they're only used if the other source of coolant is not sufficient.

For example, you take in cooling water from a river. When the river gets too hot in summer you want to use that cooling tower to evaporate water to provide additional cooling.

Which also explains why it's steam


What about the billions of tons of solar panels that turn to toxic garbage every 20 years or so, and can't yet be recycled? Not to mention the huge amount of land consumed by solar farms.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: