Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wouldn't strings(1) have worked for this?


By default, strings needs a run of 4+ (printable|ascii) characters. This sounds like it was 1 ascii character at a time in a sea of random data (with other alpha chars removed).


Ah, right. It would have to be `strings -n 1`, then.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: